Something that struck me over the weekend, traditionally faceted classification is against a controlled vocabulary or structured ontology. Products such as del.icio.us and Flickr use tagging to create a similar effect.
The tags act as a nonhierarchical structure to describe attributes that a photo or url possesses, however the facets are emergent from the weight of the tagging. By this I mean that the number of people who use the same tag to describe the same url in del.icio.us then the more the url can be said to express this property. The knowledge space for these tags is also emergent and describes the interest space of the membership.
The del.icio.us popular page gives an indication of the popular pages by numbers of people listing them. There is some interesting analysis of the tags to be done in terms of their usage, by person, by use of same words across people, by looking at how tagging develops with experience. Other things that might be interesting are number of tags used per person, or per topic area. Now to work out how to do the analysis.
UPDATE: I have since, of course realised that I have described a "folksonomy", I was quite tired, so missed the connections my brain was making.
September 2004 Archives
You can see why Tony rarely goes on the Today programme, John Humphreys does well, Tony almost flounders. The defining moment is over the war and Tony's loss of trust.
John Humphreys says (paraphrased)
You have lost the trust of the country,
they will not trust you to take them to war
therefore you cannot be prime minister.
Today programme website and the interview between Tony Blair and John Humphreys, important listening if you have 15 minutes to spare, powerful stuff.
Just finished my third etcon / etech submission, I'm very tired now, but hopefully it was worth it. I'll hear in six weeks or so. It is always surprising how difficult writing 50 and 250 words about a topic is. One on photography, one on public documents and one for work, in case you were interested.
I have decided that as well as getting a decent amp and speakers I should treat myself to a new pair of headphones, to replace the iPod headphones. The set that comes with the iPod is fine for a quiet room, but on a street or even a train you loose so much of the detail. I hunted around a bit and was very tempted by the Grado SR-60s, which seem the best sub 100 pound headphones to all accounts, but I want something I can carry to and from work. What Hifi had the answer in the form of the Sennheiser PX100 (amazon uk), which I paid over the odds for, from Virgin, as I wanted them there and then. They should be about 20-30 quid, depending on who you buy from, amazon uk have them for 22.49, they are cheaper again on amazon us.
So what are they like, well they are very comfortable, as they sit on the surface of the ear and do not try to deform the pinna. This is in part due to their design and an also due to their weight of only 60g. They come with a clever folding case to store them inside and they fold themselves in to thirds, with the earpads / speakers twisting and locking flat, there is also storage for the cable, see the pictures on the sennheiser site above, or this how to fold PDF.
In terms of audio they are pretty amazing for 30 odd quid, clear detailed sound with a real sense of separation between say the bass drum and the guitars. I have noticed lots of detail in recording I thought I knew well. They are also loud enough to make your ears ring after listening to the White Stripes at full volume from an iPod and they cope very well with LFO. Probably the best upgrade you can buy for your iPod.
I used to have a pair of wonderful Sennheiser HD 320s, which were one of the best headphones of the early 90s, after nearly a decade of hard work they finally became too broken to fix. So I went and impulse bought a big shiny set of Sony cans, which I never really liked, as they were a closed back set. Hence my raving for the new Senheiser PX100s, which are also open backed. This means I'll get the odd annoyed look on the train, but at least the music will sound great.
Over the past year a variety of geek expressions have made me laugh, so I decided to make a few of them into t-shirts, they are available on betageek. Designs might change and one day I'll create a proper site for betageek, in the meantime my cafepress store will do.
Comments and thoughts, plus purchases very welcome.
A new word I thought of in response to some things I've been working on and are in gestation. flickr.licious, systems combining aspects of the photo sharing site Flickr and the collaborative bookmarking and tagging system del.icio.us.
I've decided to finally buy some decent speakers and an amp for our house. My friend Elizabeth did this a few years ago and I visited her in San Francisco a couple of weeks later. She told me she had a list of tunes and songs that she used to check she had bought the right system. One of these was Gorecki Symphony No.3 (bbc.co.uk, amazon uk amazon us) which gracefully and quietly builds from a deep low string led opening to an emotional and intense choral second movement. It is a really wonderful piece of music, but also a good way to see if your headphones / speakers are up to it, iPod ones are not. The quiet low start has a surprising amount of power and subtlety, the choral piece is clear, simple and strong. The symphony is one of my favourite pieces of classical music.
The gist of this post is to find other music on iTunes or on CD that I can use to see the capability of my intended music kit. I know I should just listen to tracks I like, but thought people might have some suggestions and it might be interesting. Opinions on amp and speakers very welcome too, 300 - 400 quid for the pair or less though please.
Tracks and comments on why, below please.
